To Hedge or Not to Hedge

Written by Craig BasingerOct 28, 2024.

Summary: The USD has risen significantly lately against most currencies, including the CAD. There are many economic/yield reasons for this move, with the biggest being USD strength ahead of potential election uncertainties. Yet at 72 cents, the CAD may be getting too cheap.

There are so many things that are great about being Canadian, and one of them is the US dollar (USD) or, more specifically, the impact of USD exposure on Canadian portfolios. It is a natural diversifier for Canadians because it most often behaves as a safe haven currency, while our home currency and market are not. Given our resource tilt, the Canadian equity market is more sensitive to future global economic growth expectations. And so is our currency (CAD). Meanwhile, the USD is viewed as a safe haven currency, in part because when trouble hits, Americans move their cash/investment closer to home, often driving the USD higher.

Given this almost natural diversification benefit of USD exposure for Canadian portfolios, we generally don’t hedge the currency for our US investment holdings. The exception to this general rule is when the CAD gets too weak (or USD gets too strong), and we may do some partial hedging. So, at 72.2 (1.384), is it weak enough?

Canadian dollar: Back to the bottom end of its recent range

There are some excellent reasons the CAD is at 72 cents. The Bank of Canada cutting 50bps while expectations for future Fed cuts keep moderating due to stronger economic data. Today, the Fed Funds is at 5%, and the market is “pricing-in” between 5-6 25bps cuts by the end of 2025. That compares to 8 cuts priced in a mere month ago. Canada is already down to 3.75% with 4-5 cuts by the end of 2025. This is all just near-term economic data momentum. The Citigroup Economic Surprise index for the US has been rising and now sits at +20 compared to -44 two months ago. Canada was +4 two months ago and is now -13. One economy is picking up vs expectations, the other is slowing.

Add that all up, and the two-year yield differential between Canada and the  US is now at extreme levels. Two-year yields are often viewed as the better indicator for currency pairs compared to overnight lending rates. That spread is more than 1%, and oil prices have been trending downward, creating a further headwind for the CAD.

Key CAD drivers (2-yr yields and oil) certainly argue for a weaker CAD

But wait, there’s more. Speculators, based on futures positioning, are betting heavily against the CAD. And then there is the election, the US election, that is. There is a common occurrence ahead of US elections for the USD to strengthen. It doesn’t always occur as there are many moving parts in currency markets, but as election day approaches, USD often goes up. Likely money coming back to the safety of the USD just in case something goes awry. Making this not completely a CAD/USD thing, but more general USD strength against all others. For Canadians, the USD is up 3% this month; for Japanese investors, it's up 6%.

That all sounds pretty grim for the loonie, doesn’t it? But that is also why it is down at 72 cents today. Purchasing Power Parity is a model that rarely works, comparing the purchasing power in one country to the next based on the exchange rate. Yet the farther it gets away from the zero line, the stronger the attraction or mean revision becomes. Today, things cost much less in Canada than in the US. That attracts capital, that attracts tourism, that attracts acquisition interest, etc. Add all that up, and your currency will likely start to appreciate.

Purchasing power parity: CAD is back to being very undervalued

Our Thoughts

So the CAD is cheap, and the USD is expensive. Add to this highly negative futures positioning and the fact global growth is actually pretty good. Decent or improving global economic growth is usually positive for CAD and negative for USD. If it were not for a close US election in a little over a week, we would be getting really excited about hedging USD exposure. Everyone seems to be talking about contested election risk and added uncertainty. There is also the scenario where the election is resolved with less uncertainty, which could easily see the CAD snap back and rebound higher.

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights to your inbox every week.


Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements ("FLS") are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as "may,” "will,” "should,” "could,” "expect,” "anticipate," intend,” "plan,” "believe,” "estimate" or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The contents of this publication were researched, written and produced by Purpose Investments Inc. and are used by Harness Investment Management for information purposes only. This information cannot be relied on or constructed as advice.

Harness Investment Management is an affiliate of Purpose Investments, an Investment Fund Manager and Portfolio Manager